This was a Poet-It is That
Distills amazing sense
From ordinary Meanings-
And Attar so immense
From the familiar species
That perished by the Door-
We wonder it was not Ourselves
Arrested it-before-
Of Pictures, the Discloser-
The Poet-it is He-
Entitles Us-by Contrast-
To ceaseless Poverty-
Of Portion-so unconscious-
The Robbing-could not harm-
Himself-to Him-a Fortune-
Exterior-to Time-
The tone created in "This was a Poet- It is That" honors poets and leaves the reader with a respect for them. Emily Dickinson points out the fact that poems result from a poet's distillation of natural, ordinary meanings to novel and ingenious sense. A poet's work leaves beauty to be appreciated from what may have previously been overlooked. The second stanza reveals the speaker to be a reader of poetry who, like so many other readers, is often fascinated by a poet's simple yet brilliant interpretation of a familiar subject. Emily Dickinson's notion that a poet is comparable to a thief is yet another display of admiration of poetry. She suggests that because a poet's original ideas can never be someone else's, the readers have no choice but to appreciate the thought as fully as they can. Therefore, the poet has stolen and, in a sense, monopolized the idea. I concur with Dickinson's label on poetry as "amazing" and believe that this poem very accurately delineates the relationship between poet and reader. Many times I have found myself so astounded by someone else's realization that seemed so obvious, yet I was not the first to think of it.
These lines..."We wonder it was not Ourselves Arrested it-before-" I love them. When I read poetry, I sometimes connect to a line and wonder why I'd have never thought to put it that way. I think that's what Dickinson is saying - that poets put our thoughts into words in a way that we wouldn't think to do.
ReplyDeleteI have never felt it was more appropriate to reply with, "Word." So often I will read someone else's cleverly simple interpretation of something that otherwise I wouldn't have thought twice about.
ReplyDelete